Shelter operations resource
AI review boundaries for shelters
Give staff and volunteers a shared, plain-English policy for using AI as a drafting aid without handing it placement judgment.
The useful line is operational: AI prepares review aids. Named people remain responsible for accuracy, approvals, publishing, and every decision affecting placement.
01
AI may help draft
- Structure intake notes into reviewable fields.
- Summarize foster updates while preserving the source.
- Prepare a public profile draft for staff review.
- Organize applicant documents and flag missing context.
- Prepare follow-up reminders and review queues.
02
AI must never decide
- Whether an applicant is approved or rejected.
- Whether an animal is placed with a household.
- Whether medical or behavior claims are true.
- Whether a public profile may publish.
- Whether an unknown field can be treated as known.
03
Humans review
- Accuracy against the original source material.
- Sensitive or private information before anything is shared.
- Tone, public-safe wording, and missing context.
- Every approval, hold reason, and placement decision.
- Named reviewer
- Escalation owner
04
Explain it to the team
- Say what the AI drafted and show the source it used.
- Treat unknown as a valid state, not a blank to fill.
- Record who reviewed a public or consequential change.
- Stop using the draft when the source is weak or the stakes are unclear.
If this worksheet surfaces a specific handoff problem, WhiskerMatch can start with that one workflow while the rest of your tools stay in place.
Apply for a pilot →